🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."