I'm a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, But Universal Medicare Is the Top Hope for US Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding medical services. When including those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.

Travis Hurley
Travis Hurley

A seasoned tech journalist and digital strategist with a passion for uncovering emerging trends and simplifying complex topics for readers.